Neither, nor. The Possibility of the Neutral in Architecture

The concern of this research is to test the feasibility of a term, a concept that has been detected as a potential tool to name some architectural operations. That concept is the Neutral. In front of the dualities system with which we enounce the real, the Neutral places itself, not so much in the midpoint as in the opposite point of both terms. It is not the conjunction of the contraries, but that which deflects the question itself that compels us to make a choice. Recognizing the multiple interpretations of the term in the common language, with each chapter, the thesis builds an expanded definition of the Neutral to configure a set of meanings applicable to architecture. The first of them is the one that derives from the concept of functional indifference. After an analysis of the theoretical context in which the two-way dialectic between form and function lies, its consolidation in the early twentieth century and its call into crisis by the introduction of multi-relational concepts such as ‘environment’ and ‘system’, the research suggests three study models: the Typical Plan, the Single Plan and the Equivalents Plan. In each of these cases, although the fundamental issue is programmatic neutrality, it also recognizes the presence of geometric mechanisms and conceptual operations that the Neutral uses to generate respectively ‘support’, ‘frame’ or ‘field’ conditions. These three spatial conditions point to an understanding of the Neutral which associates its double negation formula (neither one nor the other) with the most incipient state of matter, that in which it not yet is, but already contains every element of the possibility of being: the neutral as potentiality. That which logic does not allow us to affirm, that one thing is and is-not at the same time, it is granted by the Aristotelian category of potentiality. Therefore, in the last part of the thesis, the topics relating these three types of space which are based on renouncement are more autonomously developed, addressing the issue of potentiality from the standpoint of denial. Starting from two basic surface conditions, the vertical wall and the horizontal floor, some speeches based on a radical restriction on these two elements are analyzed. Thus, the blind wall finds its artistic precedent in the blank canvas and the tabula rasa attitude gets in relation to the concept of ‘terrain vague’. Finally, the possibility of any potency of not being updated leads to explore the not-doing as voluntary resignation and its ability to transform itself into an act of resistance.